![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BIMS Daily Digest – Conference Day Two !
Hello from Amsterdam and Conference Day Two of BIMS 2008! Delegates were again kept entertained and informed by a series of cutting edge presentations, case studies and discussion sessions. The day kicked off with a keynote presentation by Microsoft’s very own visionary on platforms and architectures. Eric Troup, Platform Strategy Advisor, Microsoft’s Telecoms Business Unit outlined their strategy for delivering innovative, service centric delivery platforms. Over the years Microsoft has been working in all sectors of the telecoms market from network elements and servers to handsets and including delivery platforms. Troup outlined what future eco-systems may look like where content and services from multiple sources can be accessed and bundled in real time for delivery to consumers. Mauricio Najarro, Programme Manager at AT&T although unable to attend in person gave his presentation via telephone link. His session ‘Outlining the billing and customer care implications of becoming a fully integrated communications service provider’ focused on his work managing projects at AT&T. Najarro’s experience gave delegates a detailed outline of the issues and challenges that an operator will face during any transformation project. Particular emphasis was placed on the management of third party relationships and how important a partnership model is to achieve major change. The executive interview panel with BT’s Jonathan Jensen and Swisscom’s Joost Eringfield focused on the effect on customers from transformational change in billing and customer care. Interviewer, Tony Poulos asked if transformation had increased customer care requirements and had affected customers adversely. Both interviewees admitted an initial increase in customer enquiries but with introduction of simpler bills they were expecting to minimise the number of calls. Both confirmed that no transformation of the network elements can be achieved without transforming the BSS layer as well. Transformation and optimisation of the network demands the same of the existing BSS. Both companies were actively trying to reduce the number of billing systems in this rationalisation process which would inevitably lead to lower cost structures and improved efficiencies. After the morning coffee break the conference split in to two streams. Chaired by TailorMade Consulting’s Jesper Larsen, Stream A provided two contrasting visions for network operator business models of the future. First, Charmaine Oak of Orange UK gave a comprehensive account of the new services that billing systems will have to support: content, social networking, user-generated content, location-based services, near-field communication services, payment services and more. For each of these services, we need to allow for conventional subscription and usage charges, perhaps ad-supported or third-party sponsored or all-you-can eat packages. Combine all of these in various segment-targeted bundles, add the need for identity and authentication, and you have a big, complicated challenge. Clearly this is a challenge that operators and their vendors are gearing up to meet. All of this, though, is predicated on a view of the future that could fairly be described as the mainstream network operator’s perspective of the future: a future in which the carrier is still at the centre of the customers’ universe, and in which all content and services are provided by the operator itself, or by the operator’s partners. Henk Ensing of the Netherland’s TNO (a government-initiated research and consulting group) provided a somewhat different perspective. Ensing summarised the evolution of billing approaches: from network-centred to services-centred, and (soon) to customer-centred in which multiple parties cooperate in the delivery of a rich variety of on-line products. Ensing envisages a future in which all charging (he avoids the word “billing”) is dynamic. Charging options are limited to “pay now” or “charge my pre-paid account”. There’s no room for traditional post-pay and complex price-plans in this dynamic world in which “each transaction is unique”. Supporting all this is a SOA-based billing environment that separates the billing process (or business logic) from the billing functions. In Ensing’s world systems will evolve to enable cooperation with multiple partners, where “no single company owns every link in the value chain”. In the afternoon session, Marcel Olieman of Base provided detailed descriptions of strategies for margin optimisation in the areas of voice interconnect, numbering and number portability, routing optimisation (cost/quality tradeoffs), and wholesale charging. In closing, Marcel underlined the value of a properly implemented and managed billing system in managing both financial and traffic flows. This was a thorough analysis of margin improvement opportunities aimed squarely at network service provider billing specialists. The final presentation in the Supporting New Business Models stream was by Hans Hodes of KPN. He described KPN’s introduction of VoIP services, starting in 2005, and the tensions that emerged in trying to fit the new technology into KPN’s billing, collections and revenue assurance environment. Hodes gave an account of how KPN met the challenge and provided his perspective on the valuable lessons learned and experience acquired in the areas of process management, IT implementation, project management and product definition. The key messages: the need for a customer-centric approach rather than a product-oriented approach; the need to avoid complexity in both systems and products; that lasagne works better than spaghetti… On the one hand delegates were learning how to generate potential revenue streams from new business models, on the other, they were learning to how to guarantee and protect those revenues. Revenue leakage, Fraud, Bad Debt, are terms we have all lived with now for years. And it looks very likely that they will remain with us for many more years to come. This conference track featured some success stories in the battle to claim every bit of the revenue due to the operator, but it is clear that this is an on-going battle. Chaired by Marc Trautsolt of Alcatel-Lucent, the Revenue, Cost & Financial Assurance stream began with a case study from Bareah Shankiti of Zain (Kuwait). She provided a very detailed and cogent explanation of how the Revenue Assurance and Fraud Management programmes are designed and managed within Zain. With loads of practical advice, Ms. Shankiti talked about the importance of establishing support through some quick wins that deliver real money back to the bottom line. With the resulting executive support, you can then move to map the processes, identify likely areas where more revenue is lurking and put in place the automated tools to police these processes. When anomalies are found, don’t just report on them – go around and fix the problem. Perhaps most importantly, Zain has tightly connected the Revenue Assurance programme to their new service launch programme. This rather novel approach enables the RA team to work from the initial concept stage with the Marketing group to identify the likely areas of risk. The service description can either be modified (easily at this early stage) to minimize risk, or the RA programme can be tuned and ready to manage the new service when launched. Cross company collaboration was in fact a critical success factor for the Zain team. By working closely with each department, the RA team is able to benefit from each group’s expertise, improve its controls and business rules and deliver better results with each iteration. Important lessons learned were provided by the other presenters in this track too: Samie Ahmed Kazi of Omantel; Scheherazadé Bokhari of T-Mobile UK, and Steve McGonagle of BT. In examining some of the new problems that can arise when delivering new services provided by content partners, Mr. Kazi reinforced the importance of testing the end-to-end process of ordering, provisioning and billing – thoroughly – before launching any new service. Other great advice included having every group involved in User Acceptance Testing. For example, make sure that Finance, Accounting and Marketing all have a chance to test the system for the results they expect, in addition to the usual “users” Network Operations, Customer Service and Billing
And the bottom line? Always look in your suspense bucket! More from us tomorrow, but for now a big thank you to my team of roving reporters! Tony Poulos, AsiaPac Representative, TM Forum With warm regards from Amsterdam,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||